Legal Opinion

United States v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.

The action is brought under section 22 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (41 U. S. Stat. at Large, 314), commonly known as the “ Volstead Act,” to enjoin a nuisance alleged to be the possession and sale of intoxicating liquors in the Commercial Hotel in the village of Cobleskill, N. Y. The defendant Myers was the owner of the building and the defendant Price the tenant. So far as material here, section 22 of title 2 of said act reads as follows: “An action to enjoin any nuisance defined in this title [tit. 2, § 21] may be brought in the name of the United States by * ' * * any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cragin v. . LovellNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  3. Chase v. Proprietors of the Revere HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Cogswell v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. In re LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Yett v. PetersOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cole v. United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. People v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. United States v. Van PattenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API