Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Yett v. Peters

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The pertinent allegations of the writ are as follows:

That the relators, Porter W. Yett and Bernice I. Christiensen, at all times mentioned therein, and for many years last past, have been and still are residents and inhabitants of the City of Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon;

That the respondent, Honorable R. Frank Peters, is the Circuit Judge of the State of Oregon for Washington County;

That on or about the-day of April, 1948, the following individuals, residents of Washington County, Oregon, as plaintiffs, to-wit: Roy E. and Ethel M. Leitz,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Northern Indiana Railroad Co. v. MICHIGAN CENT. RD. CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1910
  4. Lakeland Ideal Farm & Drainage District v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  5. Lovell v. School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Furtick v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API