Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Manthei

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1997No. 23035Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the following opinion of the Court of Appeals correctly decided this case:

WALTERS, Chief Judge

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Bradley Manthei entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a controlled substance, a felony. I.C. § 37-2732(e)(l). Prior to the entry of the conditional plea, Manthei had filed a motion to suppress the controlled substance, methamphetamine. In the motion, he asserted that the police made a warrantless entry into a private residence in the absence of exigent circumstances and in violation of his Fourth Amendment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. KysarIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. RawlingsIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API