Legal Opinion

State v. Brockel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2008No. 20070139PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Phillip Brockel appeals a criminal judgment entered after his conditional guilty plea to the charge of possession of drug paraphernalia, a class A misdemean- or, following the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand the district court judgment, concluding the court erred when it concluded, as a matter of law, it was permissible for an officer to conduct a pat-down search of Brockel before he was placed in a highway patrol vehicle.

I

[¶ 2] On December 26, 2006, North Dakota Highway Patrol Officer Thomas Iver-son stopped Brockel…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BerdahlColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. State v. HarlanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. LohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. GowColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API