Legal Opinion
Michael Zaffarano v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1964No. 18669PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
On this appeal, the sole issue raised is the validity of an order of the District Court denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his previously entered plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with transporting stolen securities in interstate commex-ee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. The case is before us for a second time. On the earlier appeal, [Zaffarano v. United States, 306 F.2d 707 (9th Cir. 1962)] we held that the defendant was entitled to a hearing, pursuant to Rule 32(d) F.R.Crim.P., on his motion. We reversed the judgment and remanded the case to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- William L. Poole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Norstrand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Ezequial Frank Lopez Vasquez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Rosensweig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- William R. Durant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Ruben R. Cortez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. William C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.