Walker International Corp. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
This appeal is from orders of the Customs Court dismissing the above-entitled action and denying plaintiff-appellant’s motion for rehearing. The appeal turns on whether there was a manifest or gross abuse of discretion by the Customs Court. Quigley & Manard, Inc. v. United States, 61 CCPA 65, C.A.D. 1121, 496 F. 2d 1214 (1974); Reynolds Trading Corp. v. United States, 61 CCPA 57, C.A.D. 1120, 496 F. 2d 1228 (1974). We affirm.
Dismissal was pursuant to Pule 8.3(b)(2) of the Customs Court,which provides for involuntary dismissal as follows:(2) An action in which issue has been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sweeney v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Quigley & Manard, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- The United States v. Chas. Kurz Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Reynolds Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Wilmington Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tannahill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- United States v. RubinsteinUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Walker Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977