Legal Opinion

Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. UAL Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 30, 1989No. 88 C 3576PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

This is the second time we confront the legal issues arising from the United Air Lines pilots’ efforts to purchase United Air Lines. 1 The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) and Jeffrey Buckley Cockrell, a pilot for United, an ALP A member and a United shareholder, sue UAL Corporation, United’s parent company, and certain current or past Directors of UAL. 2 Plaintiffs complain that section C, 3 a provision adopted in the collective bargaining agreement between United and the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Ual Corporation and International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Newell Co. v. Vermont American Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  3. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Ual Corporation and International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API