Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fritz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1983No. Nos. 1824 and 1837PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

This case began when Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc., Trans-Bridge Lines, Inc., Tri City Coaches, Boro Bus Company, and Bieber Tourways initiated criminal charges against appellants, Charles Fritz and Nevin Helfrich, for “Theft by failure to make the required disposition of funds received,” 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3927.1 Appellants were tried before a jury and convicted. In this consolidated appeal from that judg*492ment of sentence, they contend that there was insufficient evidence of two elements of the offense. We disagree and affirm.

The test we apply to decide the sufficiency questions in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. CraftonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. VeonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. CowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. SmailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Com. v. Kearns, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API