Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Coward

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1984No. 250PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

If a woman is the recipient of a food voucher issued for the sole purpose of enabling her to obtain supplemental foods for her children, does she commit theft by failure to make required disposition when she sells the food voucher to a stranger for cash? We conclude that proof of these facts was sufficient to sustain a conviction and affirm the judgment of sentence.

Carol Gwendolyn Coward, a/k/a Carol Gwendolyn Gantz, was a participant in the federally funded WIC program designed to provide dietary supplements for needy children and pregnant women. The program was funded by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. SchusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Commonwealth v. CraftonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PeduzziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. SmailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Com. v. Hawkins, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Patton, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. PeduzziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API