Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hatfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1997No. 1996-1966Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 231.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. HATFIELD. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hatfield,

1997-Ohio-53.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension with reinstatement conditioned on proof of restitution to clients—Misappropriating client funds, falsely telling clients that actions had been filed on their behalf, and intentionally settling matters against clients’ express instructions. (No. 96-1966—Submitted October 16, 1996—Decided January 15, 1997.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnaughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HatfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API