Legal Opinion

United States v. McCord

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 31, 1995No. 4:CR95-3015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum, Order, and Recommendation (filing 17) and the objection to such Memorandum, Order and Recommendation (filing 23), filed by the Defendant as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and NELR 72.4.

I have conducted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NELR 72.4, a de novo review of the portions of the Recommendation to which objections have been made. Inasmuch as Judge Piester has fully, carefully, and correctly found the facts and applied the law, I need only state that the indictment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API