Legal Opinion

Rollins v. Heuman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1935No. 24724PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, herein referred to as defendant, in an action to recover both actual and .exemplary damages for conversion of personal property.

The facts on which plaintiff relies, as disclosed by the pleadings, are as follows, to wit:

That he was the owner of an automobile in which he was traveling, as a tourist, from his home in Ohio to Galveston, Tex.; that his route of travel led by way of Tulsa, Okla.; that he arrived in Tulsa on November 28, 1931; that said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Campbell v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dairy Queen of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Talley v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Christian v. ShidelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Welch v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Mazzio's Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API