Legal Opinion

Whipple & King, P.C. v. Donahue

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 5, 2007Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrant, J.

This is an action by a law firm to collect an outstanding legal fee from a former client. After a jury-waived trial, the judge ordered the entry of judgment for the defendant on the ground that the action was time barred by the applicable statute of limitations.1 The law firm appealed.

On April 5,1995, John Donohue (“Donohue”), a resident of Lexington, signed a domestic relations client-fee agreement with a law firm then known as Ledoux, Whipple & King, P.C.2 of Salem. Donohue was to be represented by attorney Celeste R. Niarchos, a partner at the firm, and attorneys Susan Lillis and Ian W.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. VaughanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Wilcox v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Doe v. SenechalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  4. Jenney v. Airtek Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MorelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API