Legal Opinion

James v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1915No. 5821PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by Marswis James and another against Homer Adams. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This controversy is over the allotment of Moses Anderson, a Choctaw Indian, who, it is alleged, was the son of Silas Anderson and a woman named Jincy. The suit is brought by Marswis James and Simeon James, children of a deceased sister of Jincy. These persons are therefore cousins of the allottee on the mother’s side. ' Homer Adams claims title under deeds from persons who, it is alleged, are children of Silas Anderson and a woman named Amy. If Silas Anderson was legally married to both Amy and Jincy when these various children were born, then defendant Adams’ grantors…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. In Re Love's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Haile v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Kobogum v. Jackson Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cyr v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brokeshoulder v. BrokeshoulderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. In Re Sanders' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Palmer v. CullySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API