Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1987No. C-860112Published

1DissentBlack, J.

I respectfully dissent because the defendant was entitled, in my judgment, to have the jury instructed that negligent homicide was a lesser included offense of murder in this case. I agree with the majority that he was not entitled to an instruction on involuntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense because the evidence failed to establish any underlying (or “causative”) misdemeanor, such as aggravated menacing.

I am not persuaded by any of the three reasons cited by the majority as justification for the trial court’s refusal to instruct on negligent homicide as a lesser included offense…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RohdesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API