Legal Opinion

People v. Donohoe

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1962No. Crim. 4038PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendants John Richard Donohoe and Roberta Grace Hinson were charged in an information with the robbery of one Joe Zoller and in a second count with having committed an assault on Zoller by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. Donohoe was also charged with three prior convictions. A jury found the defendant Donohoe guilty of both counts and the defendant Hinson guilty of robbery but not guilty of the assault. Upon motions made separately as to each defendant, the matter was then referred to the probation officer pending pronouncement of judgment and sentence. The court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. RidleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. TealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API