Legal Opinion

Card v. Elmer C. Breur, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 30, 1941No. 20687PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

Full consideration of the motion and the nine requests contained therein results in the denial of the motion for the following reasons.

As to the first request, the recent holding of the Court of Appeals for this circuit in Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc., June 25, 1941, 121 F.2d 285, disposes of the contention that any jurisdictional amount need be alleged in an action of this kind.

The second, third and fourth requests are denied on the ground that the complaint is sufficiently definite and certain to enable the defendant to prepare its answer, which is all that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Fleming v. Cleveland Union Terminals Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Stark Trucking, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1943
  2. Philpott v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API