Legal Opinion

Cropper v. Glidewell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1912No. 7,650Published

From Superior Court of Marion County (76,596); Vinson Carter, Judge. Action by Laura A. Glidewell against Joseph II. Cropper and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

On November 1, 1898, Henry T. Hockensmith, a resident of Marion county, Indiana, died intestate, seized of the real estate described in the complaint and cross-complaint, and left as his sole and only heirs at law, his widow, Elizabeth R. Hockensmith, whom he married in 1871, by whom he had no children, and appellee, Laura A. G-lidewell, his only child by his first marriage. On March 21, 1908, said Elizabeth R. Hockensmith died testate, and devised all of her real estate to her brother, appellant Joseph IT. Cropper.

After the death of Mrs. Hockensmith, a controversy arose as to the title to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Utterback v. TerhuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bryan v. UlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Stephenson v. BoodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Habig v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API