Stephenson v. Boody
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
The appellants, Sarah Stephenson, Elizabeth Hummel, George W. Tull, Stoughton C. Tull, John J. Tull, William A. Tull and Chambers H. Tull, sued the appellee for partition of certain real estate described in the complaint, situate in Bartholomew county, Indiana.
A great number of rulings upon demurrers to answers .were made which have been assigned for error. There was a special finding of the facts upon which conclusions of law were stated by the court in favor of the appellee, upon which he had judgment over a motion for a new trial. The errors assigned also call in question the conclusions…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Anderson v. Santa AnnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Center School Township v. State ex rel. Board of School CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Falconer v. SimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- United States Saving Fund & Investment Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Laabs v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.