Legal Opinion

Elgar v. National continental/progressive Ins., 01-40 (2001)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 19, 2001No. C.A. NO. KC01-40Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

The complaint in this action seeks damages as a result of serious injuries which plaintiff suffered at the hands of two assailants on the evening of May 3, 2000. The facts are not in dispute and for the instant purposes can be simplistically summarized as follows:

At the time of the incident in question, plaintiff was employed as a driver for B H Transportation Inc., d /b/a Best Taxi. In accordance with instructions received from a dispatcher, she picked up two passengers at the Meadowbrook Plaza in Warwick and at the direction of one or both of the men, drove them to an apartment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clorox Co. Puerto Rico v. Proctor & Gamble Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. GOV. EMPLOYEES INS. CO. v. NovakSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. OlivierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. Woodland Manor III Associates v. KeeneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API