Berens v. Byram
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIOTT, District Judge.
I have considered the issues presented upon plaintiff’s motion to remand this cause from the United States District Court, District of South Dakota, to which it was removed by defendants from the state circuit court. The real contention of the plaintiff is that the suit is under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59; Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665), which contains an express provision prohibiting removal.
The defendants in this case were at the time of the alleged injury of plaintiff, and are, the receivers of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
- Sweet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Board of Com'rs v. PeirceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ruff v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Newell v. ByramCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Elliott v. WheelockDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1929
- Ruff v. GayDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1933
- Thompson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.