Legal Opinion

Newell v. Byram

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1928No. 7955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER H. SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The provisions of the statutes of the United States by which the questions in this case must be decided are contained in this extract from title 28, § 76, USCA (section 33, Judicial Code; Comp. Stat. § 1015):

“When any civil suit or criminal prosecution is commenced in any court of a state * * * against any officer of the courts of the United States for or on account of any act done under color of his office or in the performance of his duties as such officer, * * * the said suit or prosecution may at any time before the trial or final hearing thereof be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, &C., Railroad v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Slover v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926
  5. Berens v. ByramDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Naas v. MitchellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964
  2. Snider v. Sand Springs Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Elliott v. WheelockDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1929
  4. Ruff v. GayDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1933
  5. Thompson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API