Commonwealth v. Albert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of robbery, theft of movable property, and recklessly endangering another person. He urges upon us several grounds for reversal, but we do not reach those issues. Because appellant escaped from justice while this appeal was pending, and to this day remains a fugitive from justice, 1 we quash the appeal.
A defendant who is convicted at trial and absconds from justice may not, as a fugitive, pursue his appeal rights. Commonwealth v. Tomlinson, 467 Pa. 22, 354 A.2d 254 (1976). The trial court must dismiss any post-verdict motions filed on behalf of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GallowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BordenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BarronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gary Lee Doctor v. Gilbert A. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Commonwealth v. PassaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In the Interest of J.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.