Commonwealth v. Boyd
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN der VOORT, Judge:
Appellant was tried before a judge and jury on a charge of forcible rape. He was convicted. He became a fugitive and his post-trial motions were dismissed because the appellant had absconded. Approximately sixteen (16) months later he returned and petitioned the court.to consider the post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. This petition was refused and a sentence of 4 to 8 years was imposed, from which appellant took this appeal. The sole question is whether or not the trial court acted properly in dismissing the post-trial motions and refusing to reinstate and reconsider them…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Allen v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Commonwealth v. CareySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gary Lee Doctor v. Gilbert A. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- In the Interest of J.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- George Feigley, A/K/A George Stoctay v. Thomas Fulcomer, Superintendent, and Leroy Zimmerman, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.