Legal Opinion
Gielski v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided September 25, 1956No. Motion No. 4054PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard S. Heller, J.
This is a motion for permission to file a late claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act.
Under that provision of the statute, this court may, in its discretion, permit the filing of a claim within two years after the accrual thereof upon a showing by affidavit (1) that claimant had a reasonable excuse for his failure to file a notice of intention (2) that the State or its appropriate department had actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim prior to the expiration of the time limited for the filing of the notice of intention. The statute…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Skakandy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Skakandy v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- McMahon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
- Parker v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sessa v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
- Davis v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- Lapidot v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
- Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. v. Merchants BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.