Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. v. Merchants Bank
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtPatrick J. Picariello, J.
Action instituted by plaintiff bank to recover for an erroneous payment made to the defendant bank on a promissory note delivered to it for collection. The defendant bank has cross-complained against the payee (third-party defendant) of the subject note.
Briefly, the decisive facts as the testimony revealed during the trial are as follows:
A series of four promissory notes payable to the third-party defendant were discounted by the defendant bank and the proceeds credited to said third-party defendant’s account maintained at the defendant bank. The said notes were made payable at plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- McMahon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
- Littauer v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- McMahon v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Moen v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 622 West 113th Street Corp. v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966
- Helman v. DixonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Purfield v. KathraneCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Carretta v. Bud Jack Corp.Nassau County District Court · 1970