Legal Opinion

Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. v. Merchants Bank

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 28, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatrick J. Picariello, J.

Action instituted by plaintiff bank to recover for an erroneous payment made to the defendant bank on a promissory note delivered to it for collection. The defendant bank has cross-complained against the payee (third-party defendant) of the subject note.

Briefly, the decisive facts as the testimony revealed during the trial are as follows:

A series of four promissory notes payable to the third-party defendant were discounted by the defendant bank and the proceeds credited to said third-party defendant’s account maintained at the defendant bank. The said notes were made payable at plaintiff…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. McMahon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  3. Littauer v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. McMahon v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Moen v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 622 West 113th Street Corp. v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  2. Helman v. DixonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  3. Purfield v. KathraneCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  4. Carretta v. Bud Jack Corp.Nassau County District Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API