Legal Opinion

Security-First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1936No. 7965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge,

The petition for rehearing asserts that jke opjn;on 0f the court in effect finds that j.jle t>Qnc[g were sold by the bondholders’ committee to the Pacific States as a result of fraudulent conspiracy and then ignores its finding in reaching its conclusions. No such inference from the findings is warranted. The dealings between the bondholders’ committee and the Pacific States were free from any obligation, legal or equitable, to the debtor. In the absence of any lawful obligation to the debtor, the purchase of the bonds is not converted into a fraudulent conspiracy…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. James Talcott Construction, Inc. v. P & D Land EnterprisesMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Security-First Nat. Bank v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Taylor v. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API