Legal Opinion
Security-First Nat. Bank v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1936No. 7965Published
1Opinion of the Court
85 F.2d 557 (1936)
SECURITY-FIRST NAT. BANK OF LOS ANGELES et al.
v.
RINDGE LAND & NAVIGATION CO. et al.[*]
No. 7965.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
August 17, 1936.
Orrick, Palmer & Dahlquist and Garret W. McEnerney, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.
Newlin & Ashburn, Gurney E. Newlin, A. W. Ashburn, and Clyde E. Holley, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Security First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles.
John W. Preston and Agnew & Boekel, all of San Francisco, Cal., Rea, Free & Jacka, of San Jose, Cal., and Marvin Osburn, of Los Angeles, Cal., for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hanover National Bank v. MoysesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Jackson v. LudelingSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.