Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Industrial Comm'n Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing - replaces original opinion filed 3/21/02

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2002No. 90318 RelPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket No. 90318–Agenda 23–May 2001.

PERVIS DANIELS, Appellant, v. THE INDUSTRIAL

COMMISSION et al. (Archibald Candy Company, Appellee).

2Opinion of the Court · HarrisonChief Justice Harrison

Claimant, Pervis Daniels, filed an application for adjustment of claim pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1992)), alleging that while in the employ of respondent, Archibald Candy Company, he injured his back while lifting a kiln. An arbitrator awarded claimant $593.11 per week in temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for a period of 57 6/7 weeks (see 820 ILCS 305/8(b) (West 1992)), $7,828.25 in medical expenses…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  5. Texaco-Cities Service Pipeline Co. v. McGawIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API