Legal Opinion

Bledsoe v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 3, 2011No. 2011-3054PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LINN.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Shirley Bledsoe (“Bledsoe”) appeals from a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“the Board”) dismissing her appeal, which alleged, pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 353.304(c), that the U.S. Postal Service (“the Postal Service”) wrongly denied her restoration following her partial recovery from a compensable injury. See Bledsoe v. U.S. Postal Serv., No. CH-0353-10-0935-1-1 (M.S.P.B. Nov. 5, 2010). For the reasons discussed below, this court affirms.

I. Background

Bledsoe…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. Dannice E. Clark v. United States Postal Service, Merit Systems Protection Board2016
  3. Dannice E. Clark v. United States Postal Service, Merit Systems Protection Board2016
  4. Davis v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  5. Doreen K. Kingsley v. United States Postal Service, Merit Systems Protection Board2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API