Legal Opinion
Dannice E. Clark v. United States Postal Service
Merit Systems Protection Board
Decided July 12, 2016PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
2016 MSPB 26
Docket No. AT-0353-16-0120-I-1 Dannice E. Clark, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency. July 12, 2016 Lorenzo Cobb, Esquire, Sugarhill, Georgia, for the appellant. Earl L. Cotton, Esquire, and Kristen Walsh, Esquire, Atlanta, Georgia, for the agency. BEFORE Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman Mark A. Robbins, Member OPINION AND ORDER ¶1 The appellant petitions for review of an initial decision that dismissed her restoration appeal for lack of Board jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, we DENY the petition for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacinto S. Pinat v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Garcia v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Jeffrey S. Stokes v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Bledsoe v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dannice E. Clark v. United States Postal Service, Merit Systems Protection Board2016