Legal Opinion
Lokmar Y. Abdul-Wadood v. Sylvester Nathan, Lokmar Y. Abdul-Wadood v. Conrado Delrosario and Adriane Jaggers, Lokmar Y. Abdul-Wadood v. Todd Kamleiter
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 2, 1996No. 96-1074, 96-1296 and 96-1527PublishedCited by 235 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Lokmar Abdul-Wadood, a prisoner of Indiana, is a frequent filer. Last month we affirmed several cases he was pursuing, concluding that two of the appeals were frivolous and counted toward the three “strikes” allowed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (Apr. 26, 1996). After losing three cases for one of the enumerated grounds, which include frivolousness, a plaintiff must prepay the docket fee for filing a complaint or taking an appeal, unless he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), added by §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by235 opinions
- Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Lewis Yaklich, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee. Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Mary SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Lewis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini v. Doctor Narinder Saini, Doctor Laurens D. Young, and Phil KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Thomas Sloan v. Lawrence LeszaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.