Taylor v. Pipes
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, parish of Morehouse. Bay, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.
A motion is made to dismiss this appeal:
First — Because the amount of the bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal.
Second — Because only one of the defendants in solido has appealed.
Third — Bt cause tile clerk’s certificate to the transcript is not sufficient.
The bond, being for the amount fixed by the judge, is good for a ¡devolutive appeal, if it is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal.
As the appeal was taken by motion in open court and the bond given in favor of the clerk, all the necessary parties are before the court.
The certificate of the clerk we consider sufficient; besides,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Fontelieu v. FontelieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Simpson v. BulkleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Jefferson v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Cohn Flour & Feed Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Lotz v. Iberville Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.