Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Stephan
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND OTHER RELIEF
TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc., d/b/a AT & T Indiana’s (“AT & T”) request for review of an Arbitration Order and resultant Interconnection Agreement issued by Defendants Carol Stephan, Caroline R. Mays-Medley, Jim Huston, Angela Weber, and David E. Ziegner, in their Official Capacities as Commissioners of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and Not as Individuals the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“IURC”). (Filing No. 1.) AT & T seeks a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated v. William D. MccartyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019