Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Tompkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 1970No. 69-163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OWEN, Judge.

The vendors under an executory contract for sale of real property brought suit against the vendees and an escrow agent1 seeking judgment in the amount of the cash deposit which the vendees had placed with the escrow agent at the time of executing the contract. There were no allegations of any actual damages sustained by the vendors as a result of the vendees’ default, the vendors alleging simply their election (as provided in the contract) to retain the deposit in full settlement of their claims for damages. The vendees’ motion to dismss the amended complaint for its failure to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pembroke v. CaudillSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  2. Beatty v. FlannerySupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. O'NEILL v. Broadview, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Chace v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  5. Haas v. Crisp Realty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Lefemine v. BaronSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. In Re DirecTV Early Cancellation LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  4. Action Orthopedics, Inc. v. Techmedica, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
  5. Succession of Jamie Landry BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API