Legal Opinion

Asplund v. Driskell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1964No. Civ. 10613PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

These appeals are from a plaintiff’s judgment (after a jury trial) for personal injuries suffered. Plaintiff, a workman standing upon equipment 15 feet above the ground, was trying to disengage an A-frame line from, and engage a load line of a swing boom crane (a “cherry picker”) onto the front end assembly of a forklift. While he was so employed, the boom line of the crane broke, striking plaintiff and throwing him to the ground. Serious injuries resulted. Plaintiff’s successful theories of negligence were (1) defendant Driskell, the crane operator, employed by defendant Hood Construction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Smithwick v. Hall & Upson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Peolple v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Davis v. EricksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mason v. CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alber v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Valdez v. J. D. Diffenbaugh Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. LitteralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API