People v. Butler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Defendant was charged by information with oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a), attempted forcible rape (Pen. Code, §§261, subd. 2, 664), and attempted rape by threat of harm (Pen. Code, §§261, subd. 3, 664). He was convicted by jury on the charges of oral copulation and attempted forcible rape. Sentenced to state prison on both counts, 1 the sentences to be served concurrently, he appeals from the judgment.
The principal contention advanced by defendant, which we will sustain, is that the trial court committed prejudicial error by refusing the jury’s request, midway in its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. WeatherfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Peolple v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. SlaughterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. HillhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. AinsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. AnjellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. CooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.