Legal Opinion

Davis v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Since the petition in this article 78 proceeding raised a substantial evidence question, Special Term should not have ruled on the legal issues raised therein (CPLR 7804 [g]; Matter of Hop-Wah v Coughlin, 118 AD2d 275, revd on other grounds 69 NY2d 791; Matter of Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 129 AD2d 348, 350, affd 72 NY2d 900). Reviewing the matter as if it had been properly transferred, we conclude that each of petitioner’s legal claims lacks merit and that the determination is supported by substantial evidence.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Hop-Wah v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. MATTER OF HOP-WAH v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ocean v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Nelson v. City of Buffalo Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Daniel v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API