Legal Opinion

Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. Roberts

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1988PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (129 AD2d 348). We find especially persuasive the absence of any language in Labor Law § 220-b (3) (b) authorizing the extension of liability for penalties and possible debarment to successor corporations (cf., Public Authorities Law §§ 2601, 2602; General Municipal Law §§ 103-a, 103-b; State Finance Law §§ 139-a, 139-b).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Alexander concurs in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baywood Electric Corp. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People ex rel. Figueroa v. KeyserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Consolidated Masonry Contractors, Inc. v. AngelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. CNP Mechanical, Inc. v. AngelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. MATTER OF HULL-HAZARD, INC. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API