Legal Opinion

Redman Industries, Inc. v. Couch

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1981No. B2533PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellees 0. Dean Couch, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Couch Mortgage Company and Associated Properties, Inc. (“Couch” and “Associated”). Redman Industries, Inc. (“Redman”) brought suit against Couch and Associated alleging a violation of the Texas usury law, and alternatively asserted a cause of action which Redman states sounds in contract and breach of implied fiduciary duty, but which Couch and Associated argue is an action in tort. In this appeal Redman brings three points of error. We overrule Redman’s points and affirm…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pansy Oil Co. v. Federal Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Rinyu v. TealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hoover v. Gregory, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. El Paso Assoc., Ltd. v. JR Thurman & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  3. Prostok v. Browning, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Rice v. Louis A. Williams & Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  5. Smith v. Chapman, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API