Legal Opinion

Prostok v. Browning

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 11, 2003No. 05-99-00826-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

Several parties have filed motions for rehearing. We deny all such pending motions for rehearing. On the Court’s own motion we withdraw our opinion of March 28, 2003 and vacate our judgment of that date. This is now the opinion of the Court.

This case stems from the bankruptcy proceedings of National Gypsum Company (“National Gypsum”) and its parent company, Aancor Holdings, Inc. (“Aancor”). Appellants asserted various claims based on actions allegedly taken by appellees in connection with National Gypsum’s valuation during the course…

2Cases cited98 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Peter C. Browning v. Jeff P. ProstokTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Nauslar v. Coors Brewing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  3. Harris v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Rhey v. RedicCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Faulkner v. Bost, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API