Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Nippert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1926No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

On October 5, 1923, judgment was confessed against defendant under a warrant of attorney signed by him; August 18, 1924, a rule to open the judgment was discharged; September 8, 1924, after considering additional depositions taken by leave of court, the order of August 18th was reconsidered and the judgment opened. Plaintiff has appealed.

As to appellant’s complaint that the last-mentioned order was handed down after the term in which the first order was entered, and, therefore, too late, see Silberman v. Shuklansky, 172 Pa. 77, where we held, as correctly stated in the syllabus to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tressler v. EmerickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. H. Silberman & Co. v. ShuklanskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Tabas v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Wade v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Warren Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Markofski v. YanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Hale v. UhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Pacific Lumber Co. v. RoddSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API