Legal Opinion

Meinhardt Bros. v. Mode

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval county. ' The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.:

The case before us has been before this court before, (Meinhardt Bros. & Co., vs. Solomon Mode, 22 Fla., 279). The case then stood upon appeal from the Circuit Court by Meinhardt Bros. & Co., who were plaintiffs in the court below, and it was reversed, the court holding that Mode, the Appellee, was liable upon his telegram of the 17th of October, 1882, in which he authorized the plaintiffs to draw on Hannah Mode for amount of judgment in favor of Kaufman vs. Myers, $227.83. The cause was again tried and resulted, as before, in a verdict for defendant, and is again here upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meinhardt Bros. v. ModeSupreme Court of Florida · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Southern Pine Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  4. Holman Livestock Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Tampa Electric Co. v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API