Legal Opinion

Tampa Electric Co. v. Barber

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 25, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; F. M. Robles, Judge.

1Per curiam

The declaration herein alleges that while the plaintiff, a passenger, was alighting from one of the defendant company’s street cars, the defendant “negligently and carelessly caused the car to be suddenly and violently started and to travel at a great rate of - speed, on account of which the plaintiff was thrown with great force and violence from off the car to and upon the street,” and injured. Trial was had on a- plea of not guilty. Verdict and judgment were rendered for , the plaintiff, and defendant took writ of error.

The statute provides that a railroad company-shall be ■liable for any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Pacific InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
  2. Escambia County Electric Light & Power Co. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Consumers Electric Light & Street Railroad v. PryorSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  4. Tampa Water Works Co. v. MuggeSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Miller v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Howell v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Roberts v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. AlversonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API