Legal Opinion

AMERICAN PETROFINA, INCORPORATED v. Brown

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1974No. Civ. 1329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

DUPREE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action for violation of the Lanham Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1), 1116-1118, 1125(a), 1126), for common law trademark and trade name infringements, and for unfair competition, laying jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1121, 28 U.S.C. § 1338(b), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1126, and 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiffs are Delaware corporations with their principal places of business in Texas. They are owned by Belgian Petrofina, a Belgian corporation, and Canadian Petrofina, a Canadian…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sidney Kent, Doing Business as Dorald Engineering Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. John Lecroy & Son, Inc. v. Langis Foods, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  3. Kent v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lodestar Anstalt v. Bacardi & Company Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Scm Corporation v. Langis Foods Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API