Legal Opinion
Sidney Kent, Doing Business as Dorald Engineering Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 30, 1965No. 211, Docket 29050PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLUMENFELD, District Judge:
Sidney Kent, d/b/a Doraid Engineering Co., moved in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for summary judgment on his claim for extra expenses resulting from government-caused delays in his performance of a construction contract for the Government. The District Court held that the contract was not breached by the Government, denied the plaintiff’s motion, and granted summary judgment for the defendant. We hold that there were no questions of fact in dispute and that Kent’s claims do not establish any breach of the contract, and we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Laburnum Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Limited, Plaintiffs- Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and Third-Party Plaintiff- Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Japan Air Lines Co., Ltd., Third-Party Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Burgess Construction Co. v. M. Morrin & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Central Steel Drum Co. v. Gold Cooperage, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. DiDonatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Burgess Construction Company, an Alaska Corporation v. M. Morrin & Son Company, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and General Insurance Company of America, an Insurance Company, U.S. For the Use and Benefit of M. Morrin & Son Company, Inc., a Utah Corporation v. Burgess Construction Company, an Alaska Corporation, and General Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.