Legal Opinion
Moore v. Aegon Reinsurance Co. of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ross, J.
The issue presented by these appeals is whether the defendant-appellant, Instituto De Resseguros Do Brasil (IRB), is required by New York State Insurance Law § 1213 (c) (1) to post a preanswer security. In a decision dated October 6, 1992, the IAS Court consolidated two separate motions for determination and found, inter alia, that while the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA; 28 USC § 1602 et seq.) renders foreign States and their agencies and instrumentalities immune from the preanswer security requirement, IRB was not an instrumentality of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Al-Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. FranklinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995