Legal Opinion

N.H.M. v. P.O.T.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 N.H.M. (“Mother”) appeals from the August 23, 2007 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County awarding primary physical custody of the parties’ minor children, G.M.T., a male, and H.M.T., a female, (collectively “the children”) to P.O.T. (“Father”). We affirm.

¶ 2 The relevant facts and procedural history, as gleaned from the record, are as follows: Mother and Father are the natural parents of G.M.T. (D.O.B. 2/11/1996) and H.M.T. (D.O.B. 1/2/1997). Mother and Father lived in California with the children until January 10, 2000, at which time Mother and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gunter v. GunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Gruber v. GruberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Saintz v. RinkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. E.A.L. v. L.J.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. English v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. R.W.E. v. A.B.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. R.W.E. v. A.B.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. T.M. v. H.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API