McIntosh v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Roy McIntosh was convicted for driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquors in violation of the “Rules of the Road.” Gen.Acts 1927, pp. 363, 365, § 48.
The jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed a fine of $100. Thereupon, a proper judgment of guilty, and for the recover)' of the fine so assessed, was entered.
Fine and costs not being presently paid, nor judgment confessed, the following additional judgment was entered:
“It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court and is the judgment and sentence of the Court, that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Ex parte RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Zaner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Ex parte State, in re NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Howard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McFerrin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Hanby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Champion v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Peters v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941