Legal Opinion

Ex parte State, in re Newton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.

— This proceeding is an application by the State on the relation of the solicitor of Montgomery county, for a certiorari, mandamus-, or other remedial writ, requiring the judge of the City Court of Birmingham to certify, and re'turn for revision to this court, the proceedings under a writ of habeas corpus, applied for and obtained by Nancy E. H. Newton, on the hearing of which she was released and discharged from the performance of hard labor, to which she had been sentenced by the City Court of Montgomery. The judge having returned the proceedings in his answer to the rule nisi, the c;ase…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. People v. FelkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Charles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1836
  4. Werborn v. PinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rutland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Clanton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Daley v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Lacey v. HendricksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Ex parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API